• Motor Industry Staff Association
  • +27 011 476 3920
  • info@ms.org.za
  • Update my Info
  • MISA Privacy Policy
Misa_Logo1Misa_Logo1Misa_Logo1Misa_Logo1
  • Home
  • About us
    • Vision, Mission & About Us
    • MISA Constitution
    • MISA Privacy Policy
    • Leadership
    • Vacancies
    • MISA Events
    • Links
  • Benefits
    • Benefits of joining MISA
      • Video Introduction
      • Why belong to MISA?
      • Join MISA NOW!
    • Legal/Labour Assistance
      • New Enquiry
      • Progress on my case
    • Financial Matters & Claims
      • Claim Enquiry/Follow-up on submitted claim
      • Claim Forms
    • Enquiry forms
      • Application/Enquiry forms
      • Submit an Application/Enquiry
  • GBV Advice
  • Media
    • Press Releases
    • eDATA
    • Articles
  • SAF Employee Benefit
  • MISA Cares
    • Women’s Forum
      • About Women’s Forum
      • What we do
      • 2021 MISA Woman of the Year
      • 2022 MISA Woman of the Year Regional Finalists
      • Woman of the Year Nominations
      • Gallery
    • Young Workers’ Forum
      • About Young Workers’ Forum
      • What we do
  • Contact Us
    • Head Office
    • Eastern Cape
    • Free State / Northern Cape
    • KwaZulu-Natal
    • Northern / Highveld
    • Western Province
  • Home
  • MISA Privacy Policy
  • Women’s Forum
  • Events
  • Links
  • Head Office

IT’S NOT ME, IT’S YOU!

  • Home
  • Forums
  • Articles
  • IT’S NOT ME, IT’S YOU!
MISA eDATA February 2020
Feb 14, 2020
OLD, BUT GOLD. Dismissing an employee on the basis of age.
Feb 25, 2020
Feb 18, 2020

Can incompatibility lead to dismissal?

 

It is often asked if an employer can dismiss an employee on the basis of incompatibility. Incompatibility can be described as an inability by an employee to work in harmony with his or her colleagues, as is reasonably required by the employer.

  • By Minette de Jager, candidate attorney at Gerrie Ebersöhn Attorneys Inc.

 

In the past, both CCMA Commissioners as well as the Labour Court have noted that incompatibility is somewhat of a vague concept that does not fall under the three grounds for dismissal (misconduct, operational requirements and incapacity) but rather arises out of the subjective relationship between the employee and others in the organisation.

 

Recently, however, the Labour Appeal Court had to deal with incompatibility in the SA Rugby Union case. In this matter the employee, a general manager in charge of referees, was accused of having an autocratic management style, made demeaning, insulting and vulgar remarks towards his colleagues and their mothers, constantly swore, threatened his colleagues and generally conducted himself in an abusive and unprofessional manner.

 

The CCMA commissioner found that he was guilty of conduct that was grossly inappropriate, unprofessional and unbecoming. The commissioner took note of the employer’s disciplinary code and concluded that given the seriousness of the employee’s conduct and lack of remorse, this was not a case where progressive disciple should be applied.

 

The commissioner considered whether or not the employee’s conduct may constitute possible incompatibility and held that on the basis that the trust and confidence between the parties had broken down and given that the conduct of which the employee had been found guilty was of such a serious nature, the dismissal of the employee was substantively fair (i.e. for a fair reason).

 

The Labour Appeal Court concluded that whether or not the CCMA commissioner had accurately applied the law of incompatibility was not crucial to the ultimate conclusion of whether the employee’s dismissal was fair and held that given the findings that the employee’s behaviour was of a serious nature and utterly unacceptable to both his employer and colleagues, any reasonable decision-maker would have concluded that dismissal was an appropriate sanction.

 

The following principles can be extracted from various decisions made by the Labour Court and the Labour Appeal Court pertaining to incompatibility cases:

  • A meeting must be held during which the employer informs the employee about the conduct that raises a question over the employee’s possible incompatibility with either the other employees or the culture within the organisation.
  • The employee must be given an opportunity to respond to these allegations.
  • The employer must consider the employee’s response and, if necessary, suggest ways to defuse the disharmony.
  • The employee should be given a reasonable period to improve and to apply the employer’s suggestions.
  • The employer should observe the employee’s behaviour. If no improvement is witnessed, a second meeting should be called wherein the employee’s conduct is discussed once again and any new allegations are raised, and formal suggestions are made; and
  • If after such a meeting, there is still no improvement, a hearing should be held wherein the employer indicates that he sees no other option than to dismiss the employee in order to restore the workplace harmony.

 

In the end, the employer must follow a fair procedure and the employer must have a fair reason for the dismissal of an employee.

Share
MISA
MISA

Related posts

Feb 2, 2023

Substance Abuse and Incapacity


Read more
Jan 31, 2023

MISA’s Audit and Risk Committee protects our members


Read more
Jan 26, 2023

“Justice delayed is Justice denied!” – William E Gladstone, 1868


Read more

Comments are closed.

MISA Head Office

 

  • 201 MISA Centre
  • 12 Fir Drive, Northcliff ext 2
  • Johannesburg, 2001
  • (011) 476-3920
  • (011) 388-0290
  • info@ms.org.za
  • Full Contact Details

 

Quick Menu

  • Home
  • MISA Privacy Policy
  • Women’s Forum
  • Events
  • Links
  • Head Office

Newsletter

© 2018 Motor Industry Staff Association. All Rights Reserved.
  • Update my Info
  • MISA Privacy Policy